🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger group of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under review simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”