🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing number of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," commented the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, support gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have expressed warnings. One foundation established by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the state government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Apart from the West, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this international conversation continues, the steps of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are less and less content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.